RFC 4636, "Foreign Agent Error Extension for Mobile IPv4", October 2006Source of RFC: mip4 (int)
Errata ID: 822
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2006-11-01
Verifier Name: Brian Haberman
Date Verified: 2013-03-16
In the header, it does not include any relationship to other RFCs.
It should say:
Section 4 of RFC 4636, on page 3, clearly states:
This document updates the Mobile IP base specification  regarding
the procedures followed by the foreign agent in the case that the
home agent fails authentication. [...]
... and  is RFC 3344.
I expected the line in the RFC heading, and appropriate links in the RFC index.
Has this been omitted by accident, or have there been strong
arguments to omit this significant link ?
In the former case, can that be corrected 'after the fact' ?