RFC 5036, "LDP Specification", October 2007

Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 6720, RFC 6790, RFC 7358, RFC 7552

Errata ID: 5587
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Ramakrishna Rao DTV
Date Reported: 2018-12-28
Held for Document Update by: Deborah Brungard
Date Held: 2019-01-08

Section 2.6.2.2 says:

  "In Downstream Unsolicited advertisement mode, label mapping
   advertisements for all routes may be received from all LDP peers.
   When using Liberal Label retention, every label mappings received
   from a peer LSR is retained regardless of whether the LSR is the next
   hop for the advertised mapping..."

It should say:

  "In Downstream Unsolicited advertisement mode, label mapping
   advertisements for all routes may be received from all LDP peers.
   When using Liberal Label retention, every label mapping received
   from a peer LSR is retained regardless of whether the LSR is the next
   hop for the advertised mapping..."

Notes:

s/mappings/mapping/

Report New Errata