RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

RFC 5810, "Forwarding and Control Element Separation (ForCES) Protocol Specification", March 2010

Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 7121, RFC 7391

Source of RFC: forces (rtg)

Errata ID: 5349
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Nikolai Malykh
Date Reported: 2018-05-06
Held for Document Update by: Alvaro Retana
Date Held: 2018-05-07

Section 7.6.2 says:

   Type:
          The operation type for Config Response message.  Two types of
          operations for the Config Response message are defined:

       Type = "SET-RESPONSE" - This operation is for the response of the
              SET operation of LFB components.

       Type = "SET-PROP-RESPONSE" - This operation is for the response
              of the SET-PROP operation of LFB component properties.

       Type = "DEL-RESPONSE" - This operation is for the response of the
              DELETE operation of LFB components.

       Type = "COMMIT-RESPONSE" - This operation is sent to the CE to
              confirm a commit success in a 2pc transaction.  A
              COMMIT-RESPONSE TLV MUST contain a RESULT-TLV indicating
              success or failure.

It should say:

   Type:
          The operation type for Config Response message.  Four types of
          operations for the Config Response message are defined:

       Type = "SET-RESPONSE" - This operation is for the response of the
              SET operation of LFB components.

       Type = "SET-PROP-RESPONSE" - This operation is for the response
              of the SET-PROP operation of LFB component properties.

       Type = "DEL-RESPONSE" - This operation is for the response of the
              DELETE operation of LFB components.

       Type = "COMMIT-RESPONSE" - This operation is sent to the CE to
              confirm a commit success in a 2pc transaction.  A
              COMMIT-RESPONSE TLV MUST contain a RESULT-TLV indicating
              success or failure.

Notes:

The number of types is incorrect (two instead of four).

Report New Errata



Advanced Search