RFC Errata
RFC 7665, "Service Function Chaining (SFC) Architecture", October 2015
Source of RFC: sfc (rtg)
Errata ID: 4974
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Phaneendra Manda
Date Reported: 2017-03-21
Rejected by: Alia Atlas
Date Rejected: 2017-03-21
Section 1.4 says:
One or more service functions can be involved in the delivery of added-value services. A non-exhaustive list of abstract service functions includes: firewalls, WAN and application acceleration, Deep Packet Inspection (DPI), Lawful Intercept (LI), server load balancing, NAT44 [RFC3022], NAT64 [RFC6146], NPTv6 [RFC6296], HOST_ID injection, HTTP Header Enrichment functions, and TCP optimizer.
It should say:
One or more service functions can be involved in the delivery of added-value services. A non-exhaustive list of abstract service functions includes: firewalls, WAN and application acceleration, Deep Packet Inspection (DPI), Lawful Intercept (LI), server load balancing, NAT44 [RFC3022], NAT64 [RFC6146], NPTv6 [RFC6296], HOST_ID injection, HTTP Header Enrichment functions, TCP optimizer, Parental control etc.
Notes:
Parental control can be added in the non-exhaustive list of abstract service functions. Also this list cannot be fixed, so etc an be added at the end of the list.
--VERIFIER NOTES--
The list specifically says that it is non-exhaustive. Adding more examples and an etc is not needed.