RFC 6931, "Additional XML Security Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs)", April 2013Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUP
Area Assignment: sec
Errata ID: 3965
Reported By: Axel Puhlmann
Date Reported: 2014-04-15
Section 4.2 and 4.1 says:
2006/12/xmlc12n11# [CANON11] Canonicalization 2006/12/xmlc14n11#WithComments [CANON11] Canonicalization
It should say:
2006/12/xmlc14n11# [CANON11] Canonicalization 2006/12/xmlc14n11#WithComments [CANON11] Canonicalization
[CANON11] referencing to <http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-c14n11-20080502/>
only talks about c14n and not c12n.
If this is not a flaw but done purposely, there should be a not about it.
I could not find the original definitions for xmlc12n11 and xmlc14n11.
They are not in the referenced document.
(And google only shows copies of this rfc.)
For stability reasons it may be better to not change/correct this, as it may be already in use.
So a note about this discrepance may be appropriate. Or a reference to the document defining those uris.