RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

RFC 6003, "Ethernet Traffic Parameters", October 2010

Source of RFC: ccamp (rtg)

Errata ID: 2552
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2010-10-12
Verifier Name: Adrian Farrel
Date Verified: 2010-11-10

Section 4.1, pg.7 says:

   Index: 8 bits

      [...]

      A given index value j can be associated to at most N Class-Type
      values CTi (i =< N) of the EXTENDED_CLASSTYPE object.  This
|     association applies when a set of one or more CTIs maps to a
      single (shared) BW profile.  An example of value setting consists
      in assigning an arbitrary value comprised within the range
      [0x08,0xF8] associated to a set of CTi, the values in the range
|     [0xF8,0xFF] being selected for reserved sets.  This allows mapping
      to one of 248 predefined CTi sets.

It should say:

   Index: 8 bits

      [...]

      A given index value j can be associated to at most N Class-Type
      values CTi (i =< N) of the EXTENDED_CLASSTYPE object.  This
|     association applies when a set of one or more CTis maps to a
      single (shared) BW profile.  An example of value setting consists
      in assigning an arbitrary value comprised within the range
      [0x08,0xF8] associated to a set of CTi, the values in the range
|     [0xF9,0xFF] being selected for reserved sets.  This allows mapping
      to one of 248 predefined CTi sets.

Notes:

Rationale:
a) consistent use of "CTi" -- 'i' essentially is a subscript index;
b) avoid ambiguity due to overlap in ranges given

[The first item is Editorial, but the second one clearly Technical]

Report New Errata