RFC Errata
RFC 2142, "Mailbox Names for Common Services, Roles and Functions", May 1997
Source of RFC: LegacyArea Assignment: app
Errata ID: 1763
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Nick Levinson
Date Reported: 2009-04-15
Held for Document Update by: Alexey Melnikov
Date Held: 2010-09-02
Section 1 says:
Most organizations do not need to support the full set of mailbox names defined here, since not every organization will implement the all of the associated ^^^ services.
It should say:
Most organizations do not need to support the full set of mailbox names defined here, since not every organization will implement all of the associated services.