RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC  
Summary Table Full Records

RFC 5454, "Dual-Stack Mobile IPv4", March 2009

Source of RFC: mip4 (int)

Errata ID: 1719
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2009-03-15
Rejected by: Brian Haberman
Date Rejected: 2012-05-11

Section 2.2, pg.7 says:

   The following values are defined for use as a Code value in the above
   extension:

|     0 registration accepted, IPv6 to be tunneled to HoA

|     1 registration accepted, IPv6 to be tunneled to CoA

      8 registration rejected, reason unspecified

      9 registration rejected, administratively prohibited

It should say:

   The following values are defined for use as a Code value in the above
   extension:

|     0 registration accepted, IPv6 will be tunneled to HoA

|     1 registration accepted, IPv6 will be tunneled to CoA

      8 registration rejected, reason unspecified

      9 registration rejected, administratively prohibited

Notes:

Rationale: The extension described in this section is sent
from the Home Agent to the Mobile Node and reflects the decisions
made by the Home Agent. "to be tunnelled" could be misunderstood;
the text should better be stated as a confirmation; hence s/to/will/.
--VERIFIER NOTES--
The wording clearly conveys the action of tunneling the extension.

Report New Errata