Published RFCs never change. Although every published RFC has been submitted to careful proof reading by the RFC Editor and the author(s), errors do sometimes go undetected. As a service to the readers of RFCs, this page contains a list of technical and editorial errors that have been reported to the RFC Editor and verified by the authors or the IESG.
To report typos in published RFCs, please send email to email@example.com. To report suspected errors that are more technical in nature, please verify the errors with the authors and/or appropriate area directors of the IESG before sending them to the RFC Editor for posting.
Suggested changes that appear to modify the sense of an RFC will not be posted. If there is credible evidence that an error claim is incorrect or misleading, the posting will be removed from this list.
In general, we cannot guarantee the correctness of these errata; the reader must make his/her own judgment.